Friday, October 2, 2020

As for Me and Mine, We Will Serve the LORD: an Interpretation of White Flight

 

AS FOR ME AND MINE, WE WILL SERVE THE LORD: AN INTERPRETATION OF WHITE FLIGHT

Written Fri. Aug. 28th, 2020; posted Fri. Oct. 2nd, 2020

 

"Tout par l'intestin, et l'intestin partout" -- not a French saying.

I looked up the Bible verse which says "As for me and mine, we will serve the LORD."  It is a part of Joshua 24:15.  But I did not remember the context correctly.  I thought it was a template or a permission for the man in a household to make religious decisions for his family.  But it is spoken by Joshua, who was both the war chief and the peace chief of the Israelites.  So it is actually a template or a permission for the king or ruler to make religious decisions for the whole nation.

So, as best I can figure, I will not be working from sources in this essay -- instead, I will be writing from the gut.

To reiterate, my gut told me that the Bible verse in question was a template or a permission for the man in a household to make religious decisions for his family.  But then, my gut suggested to me a new understanding of this Bible verse: that the verse in question was a template or a permission for the man in a house to make decisions for his family concerning who and what was a clear and present danger to the family.

What is that to you, or how does it concern anyone other than me?  Let me try to explain.

Before I looked up Joshua 24:15, I decided that everybody in the United States had made up their mind about Black riots and protests many years before the death of George Floyd.  But I could not understand the conservative white point of view.  Today, I decided to read the Wikipedia article "Watts riots."  I thought maybe it might help me understand, if all of the American people had in fact made up their minds about Black riots and protests years before the death of George Floyd, and no one had bothered to tell me the results of the collective making up of people's minds.

So I read the Wikipedia article about the Watts riots in Los Angeles in 1965, and I was im­pressed by the methodical way in which the article discussed the subject.  It was like an historian's account of a war.  It covered (1) the causes of the riots, (2) the course of the riots, and (3) the results of the riots.  Under results, it mentioned white flight.  If you are a lot younger than I am, I don't know if you know that term.  It is my generation's abbreviation for "white people moving to a place where they do not live next to black people."

I had not thought about white flight in a while.  It is just one of those things that is in the consciousness of Americans my age, even if we quit talking about it a while back.  I tried to think about white flight in a new way.  This is what I came up with.

What if Joshua 24:15 was a template or a permission for the man in a house to make decisions for his family concerning who and what was a clear and present danger to the family?  Well, that would mean that the white flight (which certainly took place) was the man's decision.

But was it really?  My gut says: No.  I am guessing that white flight was what the woman of the household wanted.

Here is the scenario which I reconstruct, and I speculate that this is how it was:  After the Watts riots, the white Angeleña wife said to her white Angeleño husband, Honey, I'm scared of the blacks next door and the blacks on the next block over.

So the man moved his family to the suburbs.

As for me and mine, we will move to the suburbs.

But riddle me this: who actually made the decision for their family concerning who and what was a clear and present danger to the family?  Was it the wife, or the husband? 

Frank Newton 

Thursday, October 1, 2020

Global Warming and Other Things

 

GLOBAL WARMING AND OTHER THINGS

Thurs. Oct. 1st, 2020

 

1. Democrats are right about global warming.  Democrats may be wrong about other things, but they are not wrong about global warming.

2. Atheists are right about global warming.  Atheists may be wrong about other things, but they are not wrong about global warming.

3. Your ideology is not a package deal.  Neither is mine.

4. When John Lennon said (in his song "Revolution") "You ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow," I interpret that to mean ""Agreement on every issue with any one opinion leader is not the correct course of action for you (or anybody else)."   God wants us to agree with one group of people about one issue, and a different group of people about another issue.

Frank Newton

Monday, July 27, 2020

Not All Policemen Are Good Guys

NOT ALL POLICEMEN ARE GOOD GUYS
Mon. July 27th, 2020

My own group, the white men, is one of the hardest groups for me to understand.  Sometimes it is easier to ask the white women.  They have a certain patience with me, sometimes.

Okay, you're a white person of one sex or another.  A policeman kills a white child.  You point to the story and you say, see, they kill us too.  But you don't seem to be angry about it.  What is going on?  Why are you not angry at the policeman?  Do you believe that nobody's lives matter?

Footnote. 
If we are discussing policemen as bad apples, we need to call them by their old name, policeMEN, not by their new name, police OFFICERS.  This is not a police OFFICER problem.  This is a policeMAN problem.  If we don't use the older term, we are messing up the accurate transmission of information to the next generation.  Political correctness be damned for the duration of this discussion!

Frank Newton

Sunday, July 12, 2020

The Parable of the Wise and Foolish Israelites

THE PARABLE OF THE WISE AND FOOLISH ISRAELITES

Sun. 7-12-2020

By Frank Newton -- Boiling Springs, North Carolina 

 

In the days of Moses, a plague struck the pigs1 of the Israelites, and their pigs started dying.   Some of the Israelites ate the meat of the pigs who had died of the plague, because they had no other meat.  But some of the Israelites who ate the meat of the plagued pigs died.  So Moses (who was the chief health officer of his people) decreed that the Israelites should stop eating pigs.

 

The next thing that happened was the Israelites split into two groups.  One group was of the opinion that the decree of Moses concerning the pigs was wise, and they obeyed it.  The other group (who followed a false prophet named the Jackal) was of the opinion that Moses was an idiot, and they kept on eating pigs. 

 

Some of the ones who continued eating pigs died, but others of them lived to a ripe old age.  Statistically speaking, though, the Israelites who thought that Moses was wise, and obeyed him, had better health outcomes.

 

One Israelite had just bought one hundred pigs from a passing Midianite, before Moses announced his decree.  This Israelite was very unhappy about Moses' decree, because he had invested a chunk of his substance in the pigs.

 

[At this point, the two manuscripts of the Parable diverge.  Here, we will translate each manuscript separately.]

 

Manuscript Alpha says:

 

He went to Moses and protested, but Moses told him to kill all his pigs.

 

Manuscript Omega says:

 

He went to Moses and protested, so Moses advised him to sell the pigs to the Egyptians.  Everybody was happy except the Egyptians.

 

[From this point on, "Alpha" and "Omega" have the same wording.]

 

In the fullness of time, after a lot of people and a lot of pigs had died, the plague died down.  And when Moses was well stricken in years, he died.  Also, one by one all the people who had strong opinions about whether Moses was a wise man or an idiot died.  After that, some Israelites were ready to forget the whole thing, but the people who took an interest in dead people decided that Moses was a wise man, and they confirmed his decree.  So even unto this day, the Israelites will not eat pigs.

 

1 An earlier translation calls them "the hogs." Some experts believe that, in the days of King James, this word was pronounced "hawgs."

Thursday, July 9, 2020

Confederate Statues

CONFEDERATE STATUES
By Frank Newton / July 9th, 2020


They fought for the right to secede from the United States.  They were right.  They fought to defend slavery.  They were wrong.  Dealing with slavery is part of the problem.  Another part of the problem is that you have to admit that the South had a right to secede from the United States.  It really wasn't about preserving the Union.  It really was about slavery.  Warriors who say that it is dangerous for the United States of America to become smaller are wrong.

Monday, June 15, 2020

On Rioting; On the Abuse of Detainees' Rights; On the Duty of Citizens


ON RIOTING; ON THE ABUSE OF DETAINEES' RIGHTS; ON THE DUTY OF CITIZENS
By Frank Newton, Boiling Springs, North Carolina

=> REVISED VERSION <=
Mon. June 15th, 2020


1. Preamble

We are trapped in a sequence of recurring tragedies.  The people cry out for justice.

Since the murder of George Floyd, Americans have gone into the streets in numbers to show their anger, and to petition for redress of grievances.

The citizens of other nations have protested, too: because they hold the United States of America to a higher standard.

During or after the American Revolution, people called Thomas Paine a pamphleteer, a writer of pamphlets.  I am trying to be a pamphleteer on the internet.  This is my pamphlet.

2. On Rioting

Do you believe Von Clausewitz's saying: [because men have found it is difficult for their country to obtain what they feel is its due] "War is a continuation of diplomacy by other means"?

Here is what I believe: Rioting is a continuation of political discourse by other means.

Destruction of property is a wicked thing.  But war is destruction of property.  But men say: "War is a continuation of diplomacy by other means."

In the United States, riots arise because of the failure of political discourse.  Failures of political discourse in turn arise because of the failure of the non-poor to listen to the discourse of the poor.

There are those who say: We have no choice but to listen to the discourse of the rich.  We might listen to the discourse of the middle class.  But there is no need for us to heed the discourse of the poor.

God gave you these riots because of your hardness of heart.

There is no law and order without justice.

3. On the Abuse of Detainees' Rights

It is unacceptable for a police officer to put his knee on the neck of a detainee. 

4. Among the Things I Am Sick and Tired Of

I am sick and tired of people complaining about outside agitators.  If grievances exist, it does not matter if the protests are led by outsiders.  Address the grievances.  Stop whining about who leads the protests.

5. Message

5a. What am I saying to arresting officers everywhere?

I am saying: courts and courtrooms exist for a reason.  Here is a quotation from the unchanging prolog of one of the Law and Order television shows:

"In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: the police who investigate crime [and arrest suspects], and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders."

The division of labor is that after investigation and bringing of criminal charges, the courts will organize the story of what happened into order, sequence, and context -- and from that judicially created account full of details, the citizens of the county and of the nation will draw their conclusions about whether justice has been served, and whether the guilty parties have been correctly identified.  The citizens then use their conclusions to determine who they will vote for in the next elections, based on how the candidates propose to make the system of justice more just.

The tragedy of President Kennedy's assassination is a textbook case of what can go wrong when the accused is killed before trial -- even if the accused is guilty!  As it seemed to me, the question was not so much, was Lee Harvey Oswald guilty?  The question was, who paid him to kill the President?  As far as we were able to grasp the situation, the answer to that question was unob­tainable after Jack Ruby murdered Lee Harvey Oswald.  From the investigation which did take place, one would have thought that Jack Ruby was mentally incompetent to tell investigators who paid him, or to help investigators understand what motivated him.  The upshot, as best I could understand. was that innocent men had their repu­tations attacked in the years that fol­lowed, because the courts had had no opportunity to put the story of what happened into order, sequence, and context for the people of the United States. It could not be done, because there is no trial of a dead defendant.

If the principle of keeping the accused alive until trial applies to the guilty accused person, it applies so much more strongly to the innocent accused person!

I am saying to the arresting police officer: Give the man you are arresting a chance to defend himself.  His chance to defend himself is in court.  Your job is to preserve his life until he has had that chance.

I am saying to the arresting police officer: In an arrest, you may only have a split second to determine whether to fire your gun.  Train yourself with dedication and resolve to use that split second as a person of good will would use it.

I have spoken of man this and man that, because when a police officer murders a person being arrested, it always seems to be a man murdering a man.  Murder is not abstract but concrete.  I have tried to fit my description to the facts of what happens in these abominable failures of justice.

5b. What am I saying to high-ranking police officials?

What am I saying to the police chiefs who are in charge of hiring rookie cops, or in charge of studying and acting on reports of questionable behavior of junior white police officers when they are arresting or detaining black people?

I am saying: do something about this intolerable and loathesome situation.

With the help of psychologists, figure out some way to weed out men who do not have what it takes to be on your force.  That is your work.  Keep working on it.  That is what we ask of you.

5c. What am I saying about the President of the United States?

It is beyond my power to enumerate this President's abuses.

But I will name his basic problem: he is no good at his job.  Like most other jobs in this and every country, his job requires honesty.  This President does not know how to be honest.  He is not dedicated to the proposition that honesty is the best policy.  He is also mean-spirited.  Being a spiteful man, it makes him angry if his subordinates win any praise, or any reputation for doing the right thing.

5d. What am I saying to young people, in justification of old people?

The difference in age between the Democratic candidate and the Republican candidate-apparent for President is negligible.  They are both old men.  I heard a very serious young man recently criticize Candidate Biden severely.  That was after Candidate Biden -- in a speech lofty by comparison with anything that comes out of the mouth of the man in the White House -- quoted Martin Luther King, Jr. saying "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."  To an old man like me, that rings as a hopeful statement!  But to a young man it said: "Justice is slow."  Alas!!  "Justice is slow" is not a good slogan for young people as of just now, when they are trying to survive the current arc of abuse of power and trust by the most abusive president in our lifetime.

But I am saying this: Not all old men are bad.  There are good old men, there are bad old men.  We are all a little bent over, and we may look much the same on the outside: That is because we have all absorbed a lifetime's worth of troubling but truthful news reports, which have reluctantly driven us to conclude that changing the wicked ways of the world is far, far harder than we ever thought it would be when we were your age.  If the wicked prosper: it is not because the good people aren't trying their best.

6. Remedies

We are thankful for parents who protect and feed their children and raise them well.  But we are not thankful for abusive parents.

We are thankful for police officers who protect citizens from lawlessness.  But we are not thankful for abusive police officers.

The United States has ways to punish abusive parents.  We need to find ways to punish abusive police officers.

7. On the Duty of Citizens

"Days of toil, and hours of ease" -- Cecil Frances Alexander, author of the words to the hymn "Jesus Calls Us O'er the Tumult."

Recently, I heard it stated on an American sports news channel that Americans at this moment have free time to consider the tragedy of George Floyd, because there are no sports competitions taking place on television for our people to watch, because of the corona virus.

Keep the people happy with pānem et circēnsēs, the poet said: bread and entertainments.  We have bread!  Now we even have toilet paper, thanks to the hard work and dedication of our workers, and the angel in the details of our distribution system!  But we are waiting for the entertainments to resume.

I am under the impression that Americans have the most leisure time of any nation in the world.  Not everyone around here has leisure time.  Some are working three jobs to make ends meet.  But, if you add up all the leisure time that is present in our country, it mounts up pretty high, I believe, compared to worldwide levels of leisure.

When the virus passes, and we return to sports competitions, Americans will still have a duty to think about civic issues over long spans of time.  That is the opposite of treating news stories like blips on the screen.

Our oppressions and prejudices are "in it for the long haul."  Our duty to think about civic issues has to be in it for the long haul, too.

In speaking of our duty to put on our best thinking caps when considering civic issues, I want to address my fellow Christians in particular.  We Christians have a saying and a belief, that the Devil seduces people.  It is a metaphor.  The metaphor means when the Devil is trying to test you, it is like you are the woman and the Devil is the man, and the Devil is trying to persuade you to have sex with him, even though you know in your heart that is a bad idea.

The metaphor of seducing is applied whenever we are being persuaded to do something we believe is wrong.  In fact: the metaphor of seducing is applied whenever we are being messaged by people we disagree with.

The fact of the matter, however, is that when people you disagree with are trying to send you a message, they are not always trying to seduce you.  Sometimes they are.  Sometimes they are not.

That is why God gave us free time.  As citizens of a republic, a portion of our leisure time should be dedicated to the purpose of trying to determine when people we disagree with are trying to seduce us, and when they are in fact men and women of good will, who are trying to persuade us that we were wrong about something we were taught to believe.  After all, being wrong happens to the best of people.

I repeat: God gave us free time in part so that we can distinguish times when people we disagree with have dishonest motives, from times when they are, in all honesty, trying to persuade us that we are on the wrong track, or have overextended our generalizations.  We must renounce enter­tainments for some amount of time every week, so that we can make a more detailed assessment of the motives of, and the evidence presented by, specific persons who are trying to persuade us to change our minds about something -- specific persons we judge to be among the more honorable section of the people who disagree with us.

There are times when listening to what the other side has to say is not the same as being tempted by the Devil.  Finding those times among the hours of our life is part of our duty as citizens.

8. On the Wretched State of the American Dream

"I have a dream" -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
"I will not cease from mental fight" -- William Blake

What has happened to the American dream?  What has happened to Dr. King's dream?  Illegal drugs done screwed with the American dream.  Illegal drugs have sabotaged Dr. King's dream.  That is just one of the troubling but truthful news reports my generation has received!

Illegal drugs have turned every economic class in our nation against every other.  The rich believe the mess we are in with illegal drugs is because of the bad example set by the middle class and the poor.  The middle class believe the mess we are in with illegal drugs is because of the bad example set by the rich and the poor.   The poor believe the mess we are in with illegal drugs is because of the bad example set by the rich and the middle class.  In truth: every eco­nomic class has sinned.  There is no righteous economic class in this matter.

Our society has to have a set of discouragements in place to discourage people from wasting their own and other people's resources, and our precious time, on addicting ourselves to illegal drugs.  When our resources and our time are wasted: our dream is betrayed, and our strength as a nation is shrunken.

But the particular set of discouragements we have in place is not working.  We have to consider other discouragements.  In other words: we have to devote some of our precious leisure -- the time we would have devoted to entertainments -- to looking at the problem of illegal drugs from all angles, and considering creative ways to make our discouragements more effective.  That is the path we have to follow to rehabilitate the American dream, and reinvigorate the movement to break every yoke of oppression.

9. In Praise of Black Football Players

To use a baseball metaphor, black football players have stepped up to the plate in the current crisis.  They have a position of influence in the black community, and they are using it for the good of our country.

In earlier generations, the black clergy and religious leaders held a leading position in articulating the black response to crises and disasters in the American system and landscape.

Black clergy and religious leaders still have my ear; so do white clergy and religious leaders.  But the reality of our generation is that black football players, in our time, have the ear of a larger group of Americans than black religious leaders.

I am proud of Torrey Smith of the Carolina Panthers, my family's football team, who has made a valuable and timely contribution to the discussion about this crisis.  His interview with Jonas Shaffer of the Baltimore Sun (published June 5th) is here.

The football players who have spoken out have demonstrated that, after hours and hours of grueling practice to play their game competitively, they have dedicated some of their hours of ease to address civic issues.

I am praying for our country.

DISCLOSURE: I am a white man.

Saturday, January 5, 2019

Songwriters' Workshop at Gardner-Webb


SONGWRITERS' WORKSHOP AT GARDNER-WEBB
Posted Sat. Jan. 5th, 2019 -- Happening Sat. Jan. 12th

Songwriters' workshop at Gardner-Webb University next Saturday Jan. 12th!  Steve Simpson, Glenn Selby, and Fiona McAllister will be there.  So will Kevin Bridges.  Will you?  For details from Gardner-Webb's News Center, see http://www.gardner-webb.edu/newscenter/gwu-distinguished-artist-series-hosts-event-for-aspiring-songwriters/ .  Jon J., will you be there?  Ezra, will you?  Kent B., will you?  Kendall and Henry (see The Shelby Star, Dec. 27th, 2018, page 1), will you?  Open microphone people, will you be there?  Darin and Brooke, will y'all be there?

Earl Scruggs wants you all to be there!

Frank Newton

While My Guitar Gently Weeps and the Smallpox Blankets


WHILE MY GUITAR GENTLY WEEPS AND THE SMALLPOX BLANKETS
Sat. Jan. 5th, 2019


Today I heard the Beatles' recording of George Harrison's song While My Guitar Gently Weeps on the radio.  I am grateful to my favorite radio station, 957theride.com for playing this great classic of rock and roll, at a time when I needed something to distract me from the ridiculous sore throat which has dogged me all fall and into January, and to distract me from the ridiculous mistakes I have made.

And I'm grateful as always to Wikipedia for their wonderful article about the song.  (Quotations below from the Wikipedia article reflect the state of the article as of the date I'm writing this, Sat. January 5th, 2019.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/While_My_Guitar_Gently_Weeps shows that over time various groups of people have agreed with me that Harrison's song is one of the greatest which rock and roll has to offer (see the footnote at the end).  And the article is a wonderful summary of the work of many musical critics who have tried to put into words how the song came into existence, and what makes it so great.

Wikipedia quotes a critic who wrote that one more recent recording of the song by another musician recaptures the grandeur of the Beatles' recording of the song.

And I, as a child of the sixties, feel that grandeur is an appropriate word to use.

Just as various memorable people of the Elizabethan era have been described as having given of their best to glorify the reign of their Queen Elizabeth I, so it seems to me that the Beatles, especially in their later period from 1966 to 1970, may be said to have glorified the reign of Queen Elizabeth II -- not by praising her, but by using the gifts which God had given them to their utmost ability: by pushing the talents given to them as far as they would go.

In this essay I will try to meditate on two themes that appear in Harrison's words.  One theme is what Wikipedia calls "the world's unrealised potential for universal love" --
            I look at you all, see the love there that's sleeping,
            While my guitar gently weeps.
The other theme is the theme of manipulation:
            I don't know why-y you were diverted, you were perverted too.
            I don't know why-y you were inverted, no one alerted you.

The Wikipedia article places more emphasis on the failure of universal love than on the theme of manipulation, and this essay will move in the same direction as the Wikipedia article.  Wikipedia quotes a theologian, Dale Allison, who wrote about Harrison's song.  Using double quotation marks for my quotation from Wikipedia, and single quotation marks for one of Wikipedia's quotations from Dale Allison, we arrive at this quote:

"Allison writes that the lyrics represent the 'antithesis of spiritual triumphalism', in which Harrison 'mourns because love has not conquered all'."

And here we turn aside to a brief unpacking of Allison's reference to spiritual triumphalism.  It is a clear reference to the words and music of certain hymns.  After the fall of the Roman Empire, Venantius Fortunatus wrote in his Easter hymn "Welcome, Happy Morning!", as translated by the Victorian John Ellerton, "Hell today is vanquished, heav'n is won today"; and in his Victorian hymn "Crown Him with Many Crowns," Matthew Bridges wrote "Hark how the heavenly anthem drowns all music but its own."  These are examples of the tendency of Christians to write and speak, in a spirit of longing, as if future consummations have already arrived.  And the Victorian music which very properly belongs with these two hymns is well-described as triumphalist!  I love to sing them.  But they do not present a well-rounded picture of our world, and that is what While My Guitar Gently Weeps seems to me to correct.

Now we turn to the grim subject of the smallpox blankets.  This is a disaster of American history, a terrifying moral failure of my white American people.  The smallpox disease came to North America with the Europeans.  When children of some of the white people died of smallpox, their doctors told the grieving parents to dispose of the blankets with which they had tried to keep the children warm before they died, because the blankets were contaminated with the disease, and certain men offered to dispose of the blankets for the parents.  This was done and the certain men -- I have done no research on their names, occupations, backgrounds, conditions, or anything about them -- gave the blankets to Native Americans, and the disease germs which were in the blankets gave smallpox to the Native Americans, and large numbers of Native Americans, adults and children, died of the smallpox because of  this miserable failure of compassion which asks the question "Why did the heavens not darken?"

The question right now before me is, do you want to approach the disaster of the smallpox blankets as an example of manipulation -- people tricking an ethnic group with whom they had no sympathy -- or do you want to approach this disaster as an example of the failure of universal love?

- - -

My answer is, the root of the evil is not in the manipulation, not in the treachery implicated in withholding the life-threatening facts about the history of the blankets -- the root of the evil is in the monstrous failure of universal love.

- - -

It is also a monstrous failure of supervision!  The grieving parents, and white society in general in this earlier American century of which I speak, failed to control the behavior of the men who stepped forward to dispose of the blankets.  White society may have tried to extract certain promises from the men who stepped forward, but if that was tried, there was no mechanism to insure that the promises were carried out -- no mechanism to control the behavior of the givers and receivers and re-givers of the disease-infected goods.  The poisonous blankets would have passed from people with more moral qualms to people with fewer moral qualms, and from them to people with even fewer moral qualms, or else to people totally lacking in supervisory gifts.

Love is not supposed to die after the first outward ripple.  And intelligent supervision -- which includes governmental controls designed and instituted to thwart wickedness -- at its best, is the servant of love.

Harrison put these two themes, manipulation and the failure of universal love, into the words of his song, which he wrote along with its musical spine.  (Others contributed to the instrument­ation.)  Of these, the greater is the failure of universal love.

"I look at you all, see the love there that's sleeping" -- it refers to the good deeds which will proceed in the future from the person being looked at.  But from every one of us, there are also evil deeds to come in future.  To me, Harrison's guitar Lucy says, Moses gave you this law, because of your hardness of heart.

Rules for the disposal of contaminated blankets are necessary.

Frank Newton

- - -

Footnote.  Touchingly, the Wikipedia article refers to the praise the Rolling Stones gave to this great song by one of the Beatles: "In their written tributes to Harrison following his death in November 2001, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards each expressed their admiration for the song."

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Jesus' Closest Approach to Santa Claus


JESUS' CLOSEST APPROACH TO SANTA CLAUS
Tues. Dec. 18th, 2018


Jesus' closest approach to Santa Claus is in Luke 11:13.  Here is the context in the King James Version:
Luke 11:11  If a son shall ask bread of any of you that is a father, will he give him a stone? or if [he ask] a fish, will he for a fish give him a serpent?  12  Or if he shall ask an egg, will he offer him a scorpion?  13  If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children: how much more shall [your] heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him?

Verse 13 begins with the word If.  But the line of Jesus' argument implies that the answer is yes. Therefore we can leave out the word "if"; and changing "ye" to you all, we can derive:
            You all then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children.

That's where Santa Claus comes in.  My wife has set up a sign in the living room of our house that says:
Four Stages of Life
1. You really believe in Santa
2. You really don't believe in Santa
3. You think you're Santa
4. You look like Santa
The first stage is childhood; the second stage is teenage; the last stage is old age; but the third stage is parenthood.

Jesus said "You know how to give good gifts to your children" (even though you are evil).  In the third stage, You think you're Santa, because you know how to give gifts to your children; and Santa Claus presides over the gift-giving at Christmas time, because according to his story, Santa Claus is the supervisor of the toymakers and the deliverer of the toys to children.

The custom of giving gifts to children at Christmas time is a good custom. It is a custom which began in what the ancestors called Christendom, that is, the continents and regions where Christianity is or was the dominant faith.  Of course!  Because Christendom was where Christmas was first celebrated.  From Christians, the custom spread naturally to atheists, since many Christians have atheist children (whom I -- I walk by faith -- will see in heaven).

It will always be a good custom -- in other words, if Christians abandon this custom, and it is continued only by atheists, Muslims, Jews, and people of other faiths, it will still be a good custom!

But in Luke 11:13, Jesus, by implication, gives his followers permission to give their children presents.  It is the closest the Bible comes to referring to Santa Claus.


Frank Newton

Saturday, December 8, 2018

The Laughing Blue Collar Worker: A Dream Quest for America

THE LAUGHING BLUE COLLAR WORKER: A DREAM QUEST FOR AMERICA
Written Tues. Dec. 4th, 2018; posted Sat. Dec. 8th, 2018

The Laughing Cavalier, a painting painted by Frans Hals in the 1620's, looks like this (if it works right on my blog):


Cavalier (from the Italian word for "knight") basically means a gentleman, or perhaps an army officer. 

My vision for America is of a laughing blue collar worker.  It is derived in part from a shirt advertisement by the Williamson-Dickie Mfg. Company (Dickies), which looks like this (copied from https://www.dickies.com/shirts/relaxed-fit-short-sleeve-chambray-shirt/WS509.html):


My vision here is not that blue collar workers are somehow the knights of America.  That is too romantic for me, or perhaps too obscure.  The vision is simply of American blue collar workers who are confident in the American economy.  That's a throwback vision or dream.

The term "dream quest" is used by anthropologists to describe a traditional Native American custom, of a youth who goes searching for a vision on reaching the age of puberty. 

The Native American custom is based, as it seems to me, on a simple but reasonable premise:

If you want to have a dream, you need to ask for one.

That is -- you need to ask your God, or my God, or higher powers, or whatever spirit is consid­ered most awesome and powerful in your world, even if it means calling upon the average wisdom of the average person (the original and etymological meaning of "common sense").

If we ask, stubbornly and repeatedly, for a vision of a confident blue collar worker, that will provide our best chance at obtaining such a vision.

I mentioned the word throwback, and you may be thinking, despite my remarks, that I am being too romantic.  But one of the things that modern people fairly consistently fail to take into account, is that the idea of change includes the idea of changing back.  "Them days is gone forever" is true about some things -- especially, at a certain point, the youthfulness of any given generation -- but it is not true about all things.  To grab an easy example, farming has made hunting less central to the human way of life; but nothing so far (in the last ten thousand years, that is) has made hunting disappear.

To narrow the picture down some, the vision is of and for someone who says, "I don't particu­larly want to become more educated than my parents were.  I would like to be able to get a job that will put food on the table for an average-sized modern family, after schooling which lasts no longer than a human childhood and adolescence, with some free years at the beginning of my childhood to play, the way children in other countries and in my country traditionally have done.  And I need my job to be an activity which does not destroy the environment for my children and my children's children."

The vision is of gainful employment and a living wage for people who don't want to become highly educated, such as was open to our ancestors.

When we consider this vision, we need to recall that the authors of the Declaration of Independence did not first conduct a study to determine if life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness was a workable and attainable goal.  Instead, they first articulated their vision and declared it as their goal, and then they fought for it.

I'm not asking for a rebellion, because the success of the American Revolution was a freak accident.  Most rebellions end like the rebellion in Spain, with all the rebels being killed.  But I am asking for a re-visioning..

Blue collar work involves growing things and making things.  The question is not whether we can re-involve human beings in these activities with wages adequate to support a family.  The questions is how.

People who have studied our nation's youth report that they need to become more resilient.  That means our youth need to become better at problem-solving, and more able to bounce back after setbacks -- more able to recalibrate and re-channel and re-try their dreams, instead of setting fire to what they have already attempted and giving up on the idea of having any dreams or visions whatso­ever.

In a nutshell, resilience is a fancy word for toughness.  What observers of our nation's youth are calling for is a national or international re-toughening -- a re-toughening without loss of mental fitness.

In the past couple of paragraphs, I have used several words with the prefix re-.  This basic­ally implies that we need, as a nation or as a species, to go back and do some things again which we have already done, or do some things which our ancestors used to do, perhaps inclu­ding some things that we thought we would never have to do again (like twisting off the heads of chickens).  Also, this re-toughening includes a re-toughening of our system of education.

I will try to add one last picture -- Norman Rockwell's painting Free Speech in his Four Freedoms series of paintings:


It's not a picture of me.  I'm an intellectual.  But it's a picture of someone that I want to be on the same team with, in terms of us having the same vision for our country and for the human beings in our world.

It's almost like looking at the jungle construction workers in India and Southeast Asia and say­ing, "Putting those elephants to work is not a bad idea, as long as we don't forget to ask 'What would Jesus do?' from time to time."  And then be honest about the answer, and try to do some­thing to make what Jesus would do happen.

Rockwell's painting is an extremely simple but effective picture of a blue collar worker standing up and speaking in a gathering of mostly white collar workers, who are paying attention to what he has to say.  This is a romantic painting, but it is not more romantic than the Declaration of Independence.  The website of the Norman Rockwell Museum (currently https://www.nrm.org/2012/01/norman-rockwells-four-freedoms/) says about the inspiration for the painting:

" . . . Rockwell wanted to do more for the war effort and decided he would illustrate Roosevelt’s four freedoms. Finding new ideas for paintings never came easily, but this was a greater challenge.  . . .  While mulling it over, Rockwell, by chance, attended a town meeting where one man rose among his neighbors and voiced an unpopular view. That night Rockwell awoke with the realization that he could paint the freedoms best from the perspective of his own hometown experiences using everyday, simple scenes such as his own town meeting."

Another website I looked at a while back (I have lost the reference) stated that the man  Rock­well saw standing up and speaking at a town meeting did not persuade the other people at the meeting, but was listened to with respect.  That may be, but it's still a useful painting.

In a poem, William Blake said "I will not cease from Mental Fight."  The American Revolution effectively began with the mental work of writing the Declaration of Independence.  All success­ful fighting begins in the mind.  We have pictured the first step in what is needed to revive the fortunes of blue collar work as a vision quest.

Closing

Three factors remain to be raised.  Firstly, the Declaration of Independence ends with the signers' pledge, "we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."  The reference to our Fortunes was not empty.  The signers were wealthy in their day.  That is not to say that there were no wealthy people among the Loyalists.  But the vision we envision cannot succeed, unless a fair share of the rich people of today sign onto it.

Secondly, the signers were unhampered by a dreadful encumbrance which drags upon us: the encumbrance of addiction to illegal drugs.  In our country today, this addiction is endemic to all social classes: to the rich, to the middle class, and to the poor; and each of these three classes blames the curse of this addiction upon the bad example of the other two.  Today, addiction to illegal drugs is a major source of strife between the social classes.  If the vision is to succeed, a sufficient number of people of every social class must renounce this addiction.

It is not impossible.  The founders of our country were faced with demons of their own.  In the case of the demon of slavery, they managed to postpone the reckoning until a lifetime after their struggle was won -- an extremely powerful strategic move.  The contribution of Virginia leaders to American independence is well known.

Thirdly and lastly, the vision depends for success on an accommodation of feelings with a fourth class not yet mentioned, though routinely included among the poor, namely, the class of people who have no job at all, no prospects of one, and sometimes no desire for one.  What seems neces­sary to me is an accommo­dation based upon Jesus' approach to the poor in Matthew 25:37-40:

37  Then the righteous will answer Him saying, Lord, when did we see you hungry, and feed [you]?  Or thirsty, and give [you] drink?  38  When did we see you a stranger, and give [you] shelter?  Or without clothing, and clothed [you]?  39  Or when did we see you sick, or in prison, and visit you?  40  And the King will answer and say to them, In truth I tell you, Inasmuch as you all have done to one of the least of these my brothers, you all have done unto me.

Jesus is describing charity.  The insight of modern city-dwellers is that the government can help very efficiently with charity.  Welfare is charity; charity is love; love is what Jesus asks.  On this matter of efficiency, country-dwellers need to trust city-dwellers.  The least of these our brothers are not the working poor -- they are the people on the dole.  The issue here is for the working poor not to be consumed with envy for, or anger with, those on the dole.  The working poor are not the proletariat in the Latin meaning, which means those whose only contribution to the state is making babies.  The people on the dole are the proletariat in the Latin sense.  The eagle defecates in many different ways.  If you are eager to hold down a job without umpteen extra helpings of education, then you need to reach peace of mind and charity (an attitude of love and acceptance) with the fact that some people in your country, as well as in every other country, do not want to hold down a job, or are unfitted even for the jobs that require the least amount of education.  They may lack your physical strength.  Goal-oriented behavior may be beyond their reach.  Jesus' saying The poor you have always with you, is a saying about those on the dole, and the saying is addressed to the working poor. -- That is the accommodation needed to make this vision work.

You can call the ideas expressed in this essay simplistic, but to paraphrase what I've already written, then you would have to call the Declaration of Independence simplistic.

Frank Newton

Friday, December 7, 2018

Trump Slammed for Not Reciting Creed at Funeral

TRUMP SLAMMED FOR NOT RECITING CREED AT FUNERAL

Fri. Dec. 7th, 2018


A headline said Trump has been criticized for not reciting the creed at the funeral of President Bush the Elder (his middle initials can go jump in the lake; I regard them not).  I thought I would comment on that.  I'm going to take the discussion in a partly non-religious direction.

The president we have is the most un-intellectual president we've had in my lifetime.  I would put him up against President Reagan in that department.  I think the reason he didn't recite the creed at President Bush's funeral has nothing to do with religion.  I think it's because the creed is too hard for him to pronounce.

Pronouncing a long string of words at the same time everybody else in the room is pronouncing them is a difficult feat for many people.  I have changed my mind about pronunciation.  When I was a young linguist, I figured other linguists were right when they claimed or assumed that people get good at pronouncing their native language, because they get so much practice at it.  We speak our native language every day.  But I have changed my mind.  I have decided that English is hard to pronounce, even for native speakers.  But I'm going beyond that.  I now think that every human language is hard to pronounce, even for people who speak it every day.  It's a miracle that there are any people at all who can chatter rapidly and confidently in their own language, like the radio disk jockeys who are the most fun to listen to.

Think about it.  The Pledge of Allegiance is hard for people to learn.  The creed is longer than the pledge.  ("The creed" is a polite and reasonable abbreviation for "any of the various creeds which are in existence."  The Apostles' Creed is longer than the pledge, and the Nicene Creed is longer than the Apostles' Creed.  I don't know which creed they recited at President Bush's funeral.)  You don't have to memorize the creed.  It's written on a piece of paper which is in front of you when you're at church.  You just read it off the paper.  That's still hard for a lot of people.

I had an Episcopal friend who said "Episcopalians must think God likes to be read to."  I thought that was funny.  I grew up in the Episcopal Church, and I'm back in it now.  We Episcopalians read a lot of prayers out of a book in church.  I don't think God likes to be read to, but I do think it is good for me to read wholesome sentences about God out of a book over and over and over again until I die.  By the time an Episcopalian gets to be my age, he or she has fragments of the most common worship services floating around in his or her brain.  But the flip side of that is Episcopalians are a minority within Christians.  A story handed down in the Episcopal side of my family has two Episcopalians (one of them a college president) observing a church full of Baptists getting out.  The college president turns to her friend and observes "Baptists are so plentiful."

The point is that reading a lot of stuff out loud out of a book, in unison with a bunch of other people, is too troublesome for most believers.  And we all know what Jesus would say about that: the ones who are not good at reading have AT LEAST as good a chance of getting into heaven as the good readers!  We all know that.  I wouldn't say God likes to be read to, but God does hear the same stuff from Episcopalians over and over.  God simply has to be patient with Episcopalians.

This ties in with acronyms.  I hate acronyms, but everybody else loves them.  The reason people love acronyms is that they're easy to pronounce.  Try pronouncing a three-letter acronym out loud, and then pronounce a three-syllable ordinary word out loud.  Which is easier to pronounce?  Here are some to practice on.

            Acronyms                                            Ordinary Words
            you ess ay                                            digital
            you en cee                                           computer
            ay bee cee                                            acronym
            ell bee jay (a good president)              president
           
See what I mean?  A couple of generations ago the linguist Otto Jespersen said (if I remember rightly) that English words are short and manly, like length and strength.  But people would rather say ay bee cee dee ee eff gee than say The rain in Spain falls mainly on the plain.

In conclusion, I think that the people who are good at pronouncing their native language are actually in the minority.  I think those people are fun to listen to, but we can't all be like that.  Actually, that was just my first conclusion.  The real and final conclusion is, I don't mind the President keeping silent while the creed is being recited.  I'm sure it's a reflection on his tongue, not on his heart (assuming that the heart is the part of your body God writes things on).  You can't persuade me otherwise.

Frank Newton

Tuesday, September 11, 2018

Chant About Employability


CHANT ABOUT EMPLOYABILITY
Written Thurs. July 12th, 2018, posted Tues. Sept. 11th, 2018


All Americans need to be chanting the same chant, “We live in a humongously complicated world, but we all need to have a job and some work to do.”  We need to chant this together, and when the rich people chant it, they need to think compassionately about the poor people.

More about employability.  You may think the problem is about laziness, but it’s not.  If you think the problem is about laziness, you do not know enough about your fellow human beings, and you need to go back to the basics of studying what your fellow human beings are like. 

Joining a church works for some people, as a way to study what your fellow human beings are like.  In my case, it allows me to hang around with some mighty good people.  But joining a church does not always work, and what I really recommend (as a way to study what your fellow human beings are like) is volunteering.  Now you may hate the idea of volunteering – deep down in your heart, you may feel the same way as Bessie Smith, who said, “I’ve got what it takes, but it breaks my heart to give it away.”  Volunteer anyway.  If you volunteer, and if you sincerely try to understand things from the other person’s point of view (“Walk a mile in my shoes”), you are going to learn a hellacious amount of information about your fellow human beings, both from the people who need to be helped, and from your fellow volunteers, and that information will help you in your job.  Your fellow volunteers may see things a whole lot differently from you.  Try to understand where they’re coming from, and what motivates them.  I said it will help you in your job – it will help you be a better supervisor, it will make you more honest, it will give you better hunches on when to take a chance on a person, it will make you a better dealmaker.  Having a heart for your fellow human beings will do your heart good.

In conclusion, find a way to get some personal experience, which will help you get rid of the idea that the root of all unemployability is laziness.  That idea is not true.

By the way, the chant is about human beings.  I’m going to spell it out for you: computers are taking over, and we human beings need to have each other’s backs.

Frank Newton


Friday, September 7, 2018

Adult Sunday School and Not Batting an Eyelid

ADULT SUNDAY SCHOOL AND NOT BATTING AN EYELID
Written Wed. Sept. 5th, 2018, posted Fri. Sept. 7th, 2018

1. The Main Part

I don’t think there’s been a good discussion about not batting an eyelid.  Not batting an eyelid means seeing something unusual and acting as if you have not seen anything unusual.  Therefore, it has a lot to do with handicaps, and handicaps are a hot button in our country, aren’t they nowadays?  So, to give you an example, I’m going to go backward in time and pick a handicap you almost never see anymore: a wen.  A wen is a giant swelling on a person’s neck, right below the jaw.  A bulbous swelling.  Really big.  I haven’t read up on the cause of this old-time medical disfigurement.  But it is useful for thinking about the meaning of the expression “not batting an eyelid.”  “Not batting an eyelid” means seeing someone with a huge wen and acting as if you haven’t seen anything unusual.

Now I’m going to try to draw a connection between not batting an eyelid, and adult Sunday School.

 “Not batting an eyelid” is a behavior associated with the leisure classes.  The leisure classes have more time to think than the rest of the human race, and one of the things they MIGHT have had time to think about is this: If someone has a wen on their neck, it MIGHT NOT be their fault.  Because of that, a member of the leisure classes might see a person with a wen, and not bat an eyelid.

Now I come to a question I have never heard discussed.

Suppose you are NOT a member of the leisure class, and suppose you see a member of the leisure class not batting an eyelid, when they see somebody with a wen.  You might ask yourself this: They act as if it’s nothing strange when they see something strange; DOES THAT MEAN THAT WHEN THEY SEE SOMETHING EVIL, THEY WILL ACT AS IF THEY SAW NOTHING EVIL?

Have you ever thought about that?  One person sees a second person not bat an eyelid, and the first person wonders if the second person would react to a case of embezzlement in the same way that they react to a case of a wen!

That’s where adult Sunday School comes in.

Some members of the leisure class attend adult Sunday School classes.  Many others of the leisure class do not.  But let’s focus on those members of the leisure class who DO attend adult Sunday School.  What are they talking about, in their Sunday School classes?

I’d like to try to answer that question.  Part of what they are doing, is learning to distinguish between wens and embezzlements.  Wens are something you’re NOT supposed to bat an eyelid at.  Embezzlements are something you ARE supposed to bat an eyelid at.  It is actually useful, for adults to spend time distinguishing between physical disfigurements, disgusting things which God does NOT want us to bat an eyelid at, and moral disfigurements, disgusting things which God DOES want us to bat an eyelid at.

I’ve known adults who were very faithful at attending adult Sunday School, and serious about it, but they didn’t look or sound to me like they were having fun.  It was to me as if they were saying, “I have already learned about obedience to God.  Therefore, I do not know why I’m still coming to Sunday School.”

My answer to that is that the point of adult Sunday School is not to keep on studying obedience to God for the rest of your life.  It is to help you distinguish between the things God WANTS you to be disgusted at, and the things God DOES NOT WANT you to be disgusted at.  That turns out to be a lesson that people can study for the rest of their lives, and the studying of it never stops being useful and good.

2. Appendix

You could stop reading here, but I’m going to add a little more.  I go to adult Sunday School, and you might think it’s because I’ve been persuaded by the argument I’ve given above in the main part.  But actually, the reason I go to adult Sunday School is slightly different: because I ENJOY thinking about the boundary between right and wrong.  Mapping that boundary correctly.  Drawing the line between the things God DOES want me to be disgusted at, and the things God DOES NOT want me to be disgusted at, and drawing the line where God wants me to draw it, not where I want to draw it.

I think that has to do with the Bible verse about the person whose delight is in the law of the LORD (Psalm 1:2).  That verse pairs naturally with Psalm 122:1 -- I was glad when they said unto me, Let us go into the house of the LORD.  Psalm 122:1 is about the person who enjoys worshiping God.  Psalm 1:2 is about the person who enjoys studying God's law.  I am lucky enough to belong to both categories!  But there are many good Christians, I think, who do not delight in studying the law of God.  Once they have attached a meaning to a Bible verse, they are not interested in discussing the possibility that it might have other meanings.

Frank Newton

Tuesday, September 4, 2018

Open Microphone at Kind Coffee in Boiling Springs Wednesday Evenings

OPEN MICROPHONE AT KIND COFFEE IN BOILING SPRINGS WEDNESDAY EVENINGS
Tues. Sept. 4th, 2018

I read in a book that a hundred years ago on Tin Pan Alley in New York City there were people called song pluggers.  They eked out a living serving as publicists for songwriters.

I am an open microphone plugger!  If you have a pretty voice or an instrument, bring a song and a smile to Kind Coffee Wednesday evening 7 to 9 p.m. while school is in session!  I will have a good time, and I will keep my fingers crossed that you will have a good time, too!

“In a little café, just the other side of South Main Street . . .”

https://www.kindcoffeeshop.org/ 

Frank Newton