Saturday, November 7, 2020

The Mask and the Corona Virus and the Art of Publicity

THE MASK AND THE CORONA VIRUS AND THE ART OF PUBLICITY
Wed. Nov. 4th, 2020; posted Sat. Nov. 7th, 2020


I try to wear the mask while I am out in public during the corona virus. 

Our nation, and maybe other nations too, had a short time in March to get out the word about wearing masks, and it did not go well.

When you need to instruct the people on what they should do when trouble arises, you have a limited amount of time to instruct them.  If you attain wisdom on what words you should have used to instruct the people after the window of opportunity has closed, the people will reject your revised improved version of what you should have said.  They will say: You completely botched the job when you tried to instruct me the first time.  I will pay attention to YOU no longer.

That is why I respect the art of publicity.

Sometimes, when people think about the art of publicity, their mind goes to damage control.  Damage control is the technique of defending the honor of an organization or group after they have made a serious mistake.

Damage control is an important part of publicity.  But it is not the only part, and it is by no means the crown jewel of publicity.  To my way of thinking, damage control is the dunghole of publicity.  To me the crown jewel of publicity, the part I admire the most (when it works smoothly which is not always) is the work of making instructions understandable and palatable to the people who need to hear them.

That part of publicity is unnecessary in dictatorships.  Do what I say or I kill you.  That's how they do it in dictatorships.  But in democracies, making instructions understandable and palatable to people is very beneficial to society.

There are two parts to instructing the people.  The first part is figuring out what the people need to be reminded of, and what they need to hear possibly for the first time.  The second part is making it palatable.  The first part is like figuring out what active ingredients should go into the pill.  The second part (in a democracy), is like figuring out what to add to the active ingredients to make people willing to swallow the pill.

I cannot do the second part.  I can only do the first part.  Here is my sketch of what the first part (the active ingredients of the instruction) SHOULD HAVE BEEN.

(a) You wear a mask in public during the corona virus to protect other people.  Other people wear a mask in public during the corona virus to protect you.

(b) You obey orders from military officers to avoid being shot.  No one will shoot you if you disobey orders from public health officers, such as the order to wear a mask in public during this virus, but it is still unpatriotic to disobey them.

I have no idea how to make this message palatable.  But your publicity people, if you hire good ones, can transform these active ingredients into a message which will be the corona virus equivalent of ONLY YOU CAN PREVENT FOREST FIRES.

The Centers for Disease Control deserve to have good publicists.

Frank Newton

Monday, November 2, 2020

The Myrrh Verse: an Essay on the Romans and the Jews

 

THE MYRRH VERSE: AN ESSAY ON THE ROMANS AND THE JEWS
Monday, Nov. 2nd, 2020


I have been thinking about the Old Testament.

The myrrh verse of the Epiphany carol We Three Kings of Orient Are (with words by John Henry Hopkins, Jr.) begins like this:

Myrrh is mine, its bitter perfume
Breathes a life of gathering gloom.

I studied the golden age of Latin literature in college.  I can report this: it is a record of the last century of the Roman Republic and the foundation of the Roman Empire -- which was a century of gathering gloom.  A long, long series of civil wars and massacres eventually caused the Romans to despair of and give up on their Republic, whose Senate and vetoes and division of powers were incorporated into our constitution.  The Emperor Augustus commanded the empire when Jesus was born.  He made some effort to do what was right.  But he was succeeded by the Emperor Tiberius, who ruled the empire when Jesus was crucified.  The scandalous details of Tiberius's adult life reported by the historian Suetonius -- Wikipedia calls Suetonius a "sensationalist" -- will not be repeated here.

The Roman poet Virgil glorified Emperor Augustus in an epic poem: the son of my boss said reading it was like chewing on iron filings.  At the end of the epic, the new king kills the old king in hand-to-hand combat in the shadowy story of the founding of Rome -- "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" as the British rock band The Who so memorably put it (though they were not talking about Aeneas).

In Fayetteville, I plucked from the trash can at the library, and took home with me, The History of the Former Han Dynasty (an ancient Chinese history book) in the English translation.  There, my practical Chinese boss (different boss) decided the library did not need such a gloomy book.  I was grossed out to discover that ancient Chinese history was as devious as Roman history.  In short, the ancients produced great philosophers and poets, but only in the pauses between their multitudinous spasms of violence and wickedness.

The Old Testament partakes in the gloom of ancient history.  To me, the second most appalling story in the Old Testament is the story in the Second Book of Kings chapter 10 in which the evil usurper Jehu has the sons of the previous King Ahab put to death and their heads brought to him in baskets.  The Bible feebly tries to justify Jehu, but you can't.  You might as well try to justify Hitler.  The bishop and missionary Ulfilas or Wulfila, who brought  Christianity to his people the Goths, translated the Bible into the Gothic language before 400 A.D., except for the books of Kings, which a Greek historian says Ulfilas refrained from translating into Gothic "so as not to excite the warlike spirit of his people."  Joseph Wright, the modern grammarian of the Gothic language, tells the story of Ulfilas's reluctance to translate the two books of Kings into Gothic on page 196 of his Gothic grammar, but then he immediately poohpoohs the story, claiming it was dreamed up by the medieval Greek historian.  Stuff and nonsense!  Bishop Ulfilas was a Goth and a Christian, and he knew exactly what he was doing.  The Greek historian has to be right about this detail.  I wouldn't translate the books of Kings into Gothic either!  As the men on television said about the basketball referees, "good call!"  I grew up in a family hearing stories about my grandfather an Episcopal clergyman that bore a striking resemblance to Little Socrates' story about Bishop Ulfilas (the historian Little Socrates is not to be confused with Big Socrates, the teacher of Plato).  The stories about my grandfather were funny and we laughed, but they were true stories.

Back to the Old Testament.  To me, the most appalling story in the Old Testament -- the only story that exceeds the story of King Jehu in violence and wickedness -- is the story of the killing of all the men, women, and children of Jericho which is described in the book of Joshua chapter 6, after Joshua's trumpeters caused the walls of the city to fall down.  Joshua was following the commandment which Moses gave in the book of Deuteronomy chapter 20, beginning at the 15th verse.  That is the Jewish equivalent of the verse of the Koran which the Muslims call the sword verse. -- Again, it is no accident that this commandment of Moses was not included in the ten commandments.  Listen, and look: Deuteronomy chapter 20 is by no means a commandment from Mount Sinai.  In commanding the massacre at Jericho, Joshua misheard and misspoke the word of the Lord.  The Bible is not inerrant.  But as far as I have been able to determine, I am the only liberal Christian who believes that the killing of all the men, women, and children of Jericho is actual history, which really took place exactly as the Bible describes it.

The massacre at Jericho is horribly mirrored by the massacre at My Lai, as reported by the magazine Newsweek in its report on the congressional inquiry into My Lai.  " 'And babies?' The congressman asked.  'And babies,' the witness replied."  The idea that civilians should not hear about the horrors of war is not true!!

The Old Testament is a dive into the deepest waters of our gene pool. -- The song "Brandy (You're a Fine Girl)" (with words by Elliot Lurie) describes the beautiful barmaid who fell in love with a sailor: "When he told his sailor stories, She could feel the ocean fall and rise, She saw its ragin' glory." -- In my poem "After the Massacre" I wrote "There is a monster at the bottom of your heart: Something about your attitude towards weak people, victims, losers. Your assignment is to clear the waters of your heart So you can see the monster."  There is a raging sea inside of our gene pool, and in the heart inside us which the Bible says God looks into!

The Old Testament describes these things, while not neglecting the little things.  Twice Abraham passed off Sarah as his sister, when traveling through God-forsaken lands.  Goofy gosh, Father Abraham!

But the song "Brandy" reminds me of another poem.  In "Noah an' Jonah an' Cap'n John Smith" Don Marquis envisions a debate in heaven between the three sailors (the rock band Steely Dan would have called them the major dudes of the seafaring world).  Jonah silences the other two, saying:

"But this here is my challenge fer saints and fer sinners,
Which one of ye has v'yaged in a varmint's inners?"

The Old Testament is like a long, long ride inside of a whale.  (The King James Version says "a great fish" -- I choose to use the word whale in its most unscientific sense.)

The blood of cavemen runs in our veins.  The Christian saying "Guard your heart" is absolutely correct.  We need to see our gene pool for what it really is.  And after we have seen it, we need to go back to the Sermon on the Mount with our whole hearts.

There are great and beautiful things in the Old Testament.  I will never forget hearing a conservative Christian that I know reading aloud the second half of the last chapter of the book of Proverbs, about the wise and diligent wife.  That Bible passage withstands scrutiny, and is to be ranked with the story of how Abraham's unnamed servant found a wife for Isaac in Genesis chapter 24; with the Book of Job; with the Songs of the Suffering Servant in Isaiah; and with the 130th Psalm, From the depths I cried to you, O Lord; and the other pearls of great price.

The end of today's part of my prophecy.

Friday, October 2, 2020

As for Me and Mine, We Will Serve the LORD: an Interpretation of White Flight

 

AS FOR ME AND MINE, WE WILL SERVE THE LORD: AN INTERPRETATION OF WHITE FLIGHT

Written Fri. Aug. 28th, 2020; posted Fri. Oct. 2nd, 2020

 

"Tout par l'intestin, et l'intestin partout" -- not a French saying.

I looked up the Bible verse which says "As for me and mine, we will serve the LORD."  It is a part of Joshua 24:15.  But I did not remember the context correctly.  I thought it was a template or a permission for the man in a household to make religious decisions for his family.  But it is spoken by Joshua, who was both the war chief and the peace chief of the Israelites.  So it is actually a template or a permission for the king or ruler to make religious decisions for the whole nation.

So, as best I can figure, I will not be working from sources in this essay -- instead, I will be writing from the gut.

To reiterate, my gut told me that the Bible verse in question was a template or a permission for the man in a household to make religious decisions for his family.  But then, my gut suggested to me a new understanding of this Bible verse: that the verse in question was a template or a permission for the man in a house to make decisions for his family concerning who and what was a clear and present danger to the family.

What is that to you, or how does it concern anyone other than me?  Let me try to explain.

Before I looked up Joshua 24:15, I decided that everybody in the United States had made up their mind about Black riots and protests many years before the death of George Floyd.  But I could not understand the conservative white point of view.  Today, I decided to read the Wikipedia article "Watts riots."  I thought maybe it might help me understand, if all of the American people had in fact made up their minds about Black riots and protests years before the death of George Floyd, and no one had bothered to tell me the results of the collective making up of people's minds.

So I read the Wikipedia article about the Watts riots in Los Angeles in 1965, and I was im­pressed by the methodical way in which the article discussed the subject.  It was like an historian's account of a war.  It covered (1) the causes of the riots, (2) the course of the riots, and (3) the results of the riots.  Under results, it mentioned white flight.  If you are a lot younger than I am, I don't know if you know that term.  It is my generation's abbreviation for "white people moving to a place where they do not live next to black people."

I had not thought about white flight in a while.  It is just one of those things that is in the consciousness of Americans my age, even if we quit talking about it a while back.  I tried to think about white flight in a new way.  This is what I came up with.

What if Joshua 24:15 was a template or a permission for the man in a house to make decisions for his family concerning who and what was a clear and present danger to the family?  Well, that would mean that the white flight (which certainly took place) was the man's decision.

But was it really?  My gut says: No.  I am guessing that white flight was what the woman of the household wanted.

Here is the scenario which I reconstruct, and I speculate that this is how it was:  After the Watts riots, the white Angeleña wife said to her white Angeleño husband, Honey, I'm scared of the blacks next door and the blacks on the next block over.

So the man moved his family to the suburbs.

As for me and mine, we will move to the suburbs.

But riddle me this: who actually made the decision for their family concerning who and what was a clear and present danger to the family?  Was it the wife, or the husband? 

Frank Newton 

Thursday, October 1, 2020

Global Warming and Other Things

 

GLOBAL WARMING AND OTHER THINGS

Thurs. Oct. 1st, 2020

 

1. Democrats are right about global warming.  Democrats may be wrong about other things, but they are not wrong about global warming.

2. Atheists are right about global warming.  Atheists may be wrong about other things, but they are not wrong about global warming.

3. Your ideology is not a package deal.  Neither is mine.

4. When John Lennon said (in his song "Revolution") "You ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow," I interpret that to mean ""Agreement on every issue with any one opinion leader is not the correct course of action for you (or anybody else)."   God wants us to agree with one group of people about one issue, and a different group of people about another issue.

Frank Newton

Monday, July 27, 2020

Not All Policemen Are Good Guys

NOT ALL POLICEMEN ARE GOOD GUYS
Mon. July 27th, 2020

My own group, the white men, is one of the hardest groups for me to understand.  Sometimes it is easier to ask the white women.  They have a certain patience with me, sometimes.

Okay, you're a white person of one sex or another.  A policeman kills a white child.  You point to the story and you say, see, they kill us too.  But you don't seem to be angry about it.  What is going on?  Why are you not angry at the policeman?  Do you believe that nobody's lives matter?

Footnote. 
If we are discussing policemen as bad apples, we need to call them by their old name, policeMEN, not by their new name, police OFFICERS.  This is not a police OFFICER problem.  This is a policeMAN problem.  If we don't use the older term, we are messing up the accurate transmission of information to the next generation.  Political correctness be damned for the duration of this discussion!

Frank Newton

Sunday, July 12, 2020

The Parable of the Wise and Foolish Israelites

THE PARABLE OF THE WISE AND FOOLISH ISRAELITES

Sun. 7-12-2020

By Frank Newton -- Boiling Springs, North Carolina 

 

In the days of Moses, a plague struck the pigs1 of the Israelites, and their pigs started dying.   Some of the Israelites ate the meat of the pigs who had died of the plague, because they had no other meat.  But some of the Israelites who ate the meat of the plagued pigs died.  So Moses (who was the chief health officer of his people) decreed that the Israelites should stop eating pigs.

 

The next thing that happened was the Israelites split into two groups.  One group was of the opinion that the decree of Moses concerning the pigs was wise, and they obeyed it.  The other group (who followed a false prophet named the Jackal) was of the opinion that Moses was an idiot, and they kept on eating pigs. 

 

Some of the ones who continued eating pigs died, but others of them lived to a ripe old age.  Statistically speaking, though, the Israelites who thought that Moses was wise, and obeyed him, had better health outcomes.

 

One Israelite had just bought one hundred pigs from a passing Midianite, before Moses announced his decree.  This Israelite was very unhappy about Moses' decree, because he had invested a chunk of his substance in the pigs.

 

[At this point, the two manuscripts of the Parable diverge.  Here, we will translate each manuscript separately.]

 

Manuscript Alpha says:

 

He went to Moses and protested, but Moses told him to kill all his pigs.

 

Manuscript Omega says:

 

He went to Moses and protested, so Moses advised him to sell the pigs to the Egyptians.  Everybody was happy except the Egyptians.

 

[From this point on, "Alpha" and "Omega" have the same wording.]

 

In the fullness of time, after a lot of people and a lot of pigs had died, the plague died down.  And when Moses was well stricken in years, he died.  Also, one by one all the people who had strong opinions about whether Moses was a wise man or an idiot died.  After that, some Israelites were ready to forget the whole thing, but the people who took an interest in dead people decided that Moses was a wise man, and they confirmed his decree.  So even unto this day, the Israelites will not eat pigs.

 

1 An earlier translation calls them "the hogs." Some experts believe that, in the days of King James, this word was pronounced "hawgs."

Thursday, July 9, 2020

Confederate Statues

CONFEDERATE STATUES
By Frank Newton / July 9th, 2020


They fought for the right to secede from the United States.  They were right.  They fought to defend slavery.  They were wrong.  Dealing with slavery is part of the problem.  Another part of the problem is that you have to admit that the South had a right to secede from the United States.  It really wasn't about preserving the Union.  It really was about slavery.  Warriors who say that it is dangerous for the United States of America to become smaller are wrong.

Monday, June 15, 2020

On Rioting; On the Abuse of Detainees' Rights; On the Duty of Citizens


ON RIOTING; ON THE ABUSE OF DETAINEES' RIGHTS; ON THE DUTY OF CITIZENS
By Frank Newton, Boiling Springs, North Carolina

=> REVISED VERSION <=
Mon. June 15th, 2020


1. Preamble

We are trapped in a sequence of recurring tragedies.  The people cry out for justice.

Since the murder of George Floyd, Americans have gone into the streets in numbers to show their anger, and to petition for redress of grievances.

The citizens of other nations have protested, too: because they hold the United States of America to a higher standard.

During or after the American Revolution, people called Thomas Paine a pamphleteer, a writer of pamphlets.  I am trying to be a pamphleteer on the internet.  This is my pamphlet.

2. On Rioting

Do you believe Von Clausewitz's saying: [because men have found it is difficult for their country to obtain what they feel is its due] "War is a continuation of diplomacy by other means"?

Here is what I believe: Rioting is a continuation of political discourse by other means.

Destruction of property is a wicked thing.  But war is destruction of property.  But men say: "War is a continuation of diplomacy by other means."

In the United States, riots arise because of the failure of political discourse.  Failures of political discourse in turn arise because of the failure of the non-poor to listen to the discourse of the poor.

There are those who say: We have no choice but to listen to the discourse of the rich.  We might listen to the discourse of the middle class.  But there is no need for us to heed the discourse of the poor.

God gave you these riots because of your hardness of heart.

There is no law and order without justice.

3. On the Abuse of Detainees' Rights

It is unacceptable for a police officer to put his knee on the neck of a detainee. 

4. Among the Things I Am Sick and Tired Of

I am sick and tired of people complaining about outside agitators.  If grievances exist, it does not matter if the protests are led by outsiders.  Address the grievances.  Stop whining about who leads the protests.

5. Message

5a. What am I saying to arresting officers everywhere?

I am saying: courts and courtrooms exist for a reason.  Here is a quotation from the unchanging prolog of one of the Law and Order television shows:

"In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: the police who investigate crime [and arrest suspects], and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders."

The division of labor is that after investigation and bringing of criminal charges, the courts will organize the story of what happened into order, sequence, and context -- and from that judicially created account full of details, the citizens of the county and of the nation will draw their conclusions about whether justice has been served, and whether the guilty parties have been correctly identified.  The citizens then use their conclusions to determine who they will vote for in the next elections, based on how the candidates propose to make the system of justice more just.

The tragedy of President Kennedy's assassination is a textbook case of what can go wrong when the accused is killed before trial -- even if the accused is guilty!  As it seemed to me, the question was not so much, was Lee Harvey Oswald guilty?  The question was, who paid him to kill the President?  As far as we were able to grasp the situation, the answer to that question was unob­tainable after Jack Ruby murdered Lee Harvey Oswald.  From the investigation which did take place, one would have thought that Jack Ruby was mentally incompetent to tell investigators who paid him, or to help investigators understand what motivated him.  The upshot, as best I could understand. was that innocent men had their repu­tations attacked in the years that fol­lowed, because the courts had had no opportunity to put the story of what happened into order, sequence, and context for the people of the United States. It could not be done, because there is no trial of a dead defendant.

If the principle of keeping the accused alive until trial applies to the guilty accused person, it applies so much more strongly to the innocent accused person!

I am saying to the arresting police officer: Give the man you are arresting a chance to defend himself.  His chance to defend himself is in court.  Your job is to preserve his life until he has had that chance.

I am saying to the arresting police officer: In an arrest, you may only have a split second to determine whether to fire your gun.  Train yourself with dedication and resolve to use that split second as a person of good will would use it.

I have spoken of man this and man that, because when a police officer murders a person being arrested, it always seems to be a man murdering a man.  Murder is not abstract but concrete.  I have tried to fit my description to the facts of what happens in these abominable failures of justice.

5b. What am I saying to high-ranking police officials?

What am I saying to the police chiefs who are in charge of hiring rookie cops, or in charge of studying and acting on reports of questionable behavior of junior white police officers when they are arresting or detaining black people?

I am saying: do something about this intolerable and loathesome situation.

With the help of psychologists, figure out some way to weed out men who do not have what it takes to be on your force.  That is your work.  Keep working on it.  That is what we ask of you.

5c. What am I saying about the President of the United States?

It is beyond my power to enumerate this President's abuses.

But I will name his basic problem: he is no good at his job.  Like most other jobs in this and every country, his job requires honesty.  This President does not know how to be honest.  He is not dedicated to the proposition that honesty is the best policy.  He is also mean-spirited.  Being a spiteful man, it makes him angry if his subordinates win any praise, or any reputation for doing the right thing.

5d. What am I saying to young people, in justification of old people?

The difference in age between the Democratic candidate and the Republican candidate-apparent for President is negligible.  They are both old men.  I heard a very serious young man recently criticize Candidate Biden severely.  That was after Candidate Biden -- in a speech lofty by comparison with anything that comes out of the mouth of the man in the White House -- quoted Martin Luther King, Jr. saying "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."  To an old man like me, that rings as a hopeful statement!  But to a young man it said: "Justice is slow."  Alas!!  "Justice is slow" is not a good slogan for young people as of just now, when they are trying to survive the current arc of abuse of power and trust by the most abusive president in our lifetime.

But I am saying this: Not all old men are bad.  There are good old men, there are bad old men.  We are all a little bent over, and we may look much the same on the outside: That is because we have all absorbed a lifetime's worth of troubling but truthful news reports, which have reluctantly driven us to conclude that changing the wicked ways of the world is far, far harder than we ever thought it would be when we were your age.  If the wicked prosper: it is not because the good people aren't trying their best.

6. Remedies

We are thankful for parents who protect and feed their children and raise them well.  But we are not thankful for abusive parents.

We are thankful for police officers who protect citizens from lawlessness.  But we are not thankful for abusive police officers.

The United States has ways to punish abusive parents.  We need to find ways to punish abusive police officers.

7. On the Duty of Citizens

"Days of toil, and hours of ease" -- Cecil Frances Alexander, author of the words to the hymn "Jesus Calls Us O'er the Tumult."

Recently, I heard it stated on an American sports news channel that Americans at this moment have free time to consider the tragedy of George Floyd, because there are no sports competitions taking place on television for our people to watch, because of the corona virus.

Keep the people happy with pānem et circēnsēs, the poet said: bread and entertainments.  We have bread!  Now we even have toilet paper, thanks to the hard work and dedication of our workers, and the angel in the details of our distribution system!  But we are waiting for the entertainments to resume.

I am under the impression that Americans have the most leisure time of any nation in the world.  Not everyone around here has leisure time.  Some are working three jobs to make ends meet.  But, if you add up all the leisure time that is present in our country, it mounts up pretty high, I believe, compared to worldwide levels of leisure.

When the virus passes, and we return to sports competitions, Americans will still have a duty to think about civic issues over long spans of time.  That is the opposite of treating news stories like blips on the screen.

Our oppressions and prejudices are "in it for the long haul."  Our duty to think about civic issues has to be in it for the long haul, too.

In speaking of our duty to put on our best thinking caps when considering civic issues, I want to address my fellow Christians in particular.  We Christians have a saying and a belief, that the Devil seduces people.  It is a metaphor.  The metaphor means when the Devil is trying to test you, it is like you are the woman and the Devil is the man, and the Devil is trying to persuade you to have sex with him, even though you know in your heart that is a bad idea.

The metaphor of seducing is applied whenever we are being persuaded to do something we believe is wrong.  In fact: the metaphor of seducing is applied whenever we are being messaged by people we disagree with.

The fact of the matter, however, is that when people you disagree with are trying to send you a message, they are not always trying to seduce you.  Sometimes they are.  Sometimes they are not.

That is why God gave us free time.  As citizens of a republic, a portion of our leisure time should be dedicated to the purpose of trying to determine when people we disagree with are trying to seduce us, and when they are in fact men and women of good will, who are trying to persuade us that we were wrong about something we were taught to believe.  After all, being wrong happens to the best of people.

I repeat: God gave us free time in part so that we can distinguish times when people we disagree with have dishonest motives, from times when they are, in all honesty, trying to persuade us that we are on the wrong track, or have overextended our generalizations.  We must renounce enter­tainments for some amount of time every week, so that we can make a more detailed assessment of the motives of, and the evidence presented by, specific persons who are trying to persuade us to change our minds about something -- specific persons we judge to be among the more honorable section of the people who disagree with us.

There are times when listening to what the other side has to say is not the same as being tempted by the Devil.  Finding those times among the hours of our life is part of our duty as citizens.

8. On the Wretched State of the American Dream

"I have a dream" -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
"I will not cease from mental fight" -- William Blake

What has happened to the American dream?  What has happened to Dr. King's dream?  Illegal drugs done screwed with the American dream.  Illegal drugs have sabotaged Dr. King's dream.  That is just one of the troubling but truthful news reports my generation has received!

Illegal drugs have turned every economic class in our nation against every other.  The rich believe the mess we are in with illegal drugs is because of the bad example set by the middle class and the poor.  The middle class believe the mess we are in with illegal drugs is because of the bad example set by the rich and the poor.   The poor believe the mess we are in with illegal drugs is because of the bad example set by the rich and the middle class.  In truth: every eco­nomic class has sinned.  There is no righteous economic class in this matter.

Our society has to have a set of discouragements in place to discourage people from wasting their own and other people's resources, and our precious time, on addicting ourselves to illegal drugs.  When our resources and our time are wasted: our dream is betrayed, and our strength as a nation is shrunken.

But the particular set of discouragements we have in place is not working.  We have to consider other discouragements.  In other words: we have to devote some of our precious leisure -- the time we would have devoted to entertainments -- to looking at the problem of illegal drugs from all angles, and considering creative ways to make our discouragements more effective.  That is the path we have to follow to rehabilitate the American dream, and reinvigorate the movement to break every yoke of oppression.

9. In Praise of Black Football Players

To use a baseball metaphor, black football players have stepped up to the plate in the current crisis.  They have a position of influence in the black community, and they are using it for the good of our country.

In earlier generations, the black clergy and religious leaders held a leading position in articulating the black response to crises and disasters in the American system and landscape.

Black clergy and religious leaders still have my ear; so do white clergy and religious leaders.  But the reality of our generation is that black football players, in our time, have the ear of a larger group of Americans than black religious leaders.

I am proud of Torrey Smith of the Carolina Panthers, my family's football team, who has made a valuable and timely contribution to the discussion about this crisis.  His interview with Jonas Shaffer of the Baltimore Sun (published June 5th) is here.

The football players who have spoken out have demonstrated that, after hours and hours of grueling practice to play their game competitively, they have dedicated some of their hours of ease to address civic issues.

I am praying for our country.

DISCLOSURE: I am a white man.